- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
Please click this link to help me keep The Angry Atheist active with an donation.
AS the UK slowly — far too slowly — edges towards legalising assisted suicide in England and Wales, the Catholic Church’s Cardinal Vincent Nichols, above, yesterday issued a pastoral letter to church members, urging then to put pressure on MPs to vote against the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.
He stuck his ecclesiastical nose into the issue just before MPs reviewing the Bill today agreed that judges should not be involved in the process. Instead a three-person panel comprising a senior legal figure, a psychiatrist and a social worker should oversee applications.
Nichols, President of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, asks in his letter, which will be read in the parishes of Westminster archdiocese over the weekend of 5-6 April, “can MPs guarantee that the scope of the Bill will not be extended?”
He adds:
In almost every country where assisted suicide has been introduced the current scope is wider than was originally intended. What role, if any, will the judiciary have in the process? We were told that judicial oversight was a necessary and vital part of the process; now we are told it isn’t needed at all. What will protect the vulnerable from coercion, or from feeling a burden on family? Can the National Health Service cope with assisted suicide or will it, as the Health Secretary has warned, cause cuts elsewhere in the NHS? Can MPs guarantee that no medical practitioner or care worker would be compelled to take part in assisted suicide? Would this mean the establishment of a ‘national death service’?
As well as restating the Bishops’ objections to the Bill in principle, Cardinal Nichols expresses his dissatisfaction regarding the “deeply flawed” parliamentary process.
It is a fundamental duty of every MP to ensure that legislation is not imposed on our society which has not been properly scrutinised and which will bring about damaging consequences.
Questioning why there has not been a Royal Commission or independent inquiry before considering changing the law “on matters of, literally, life and death”, the Cardinal wrote:
The Bill itself is long and complex and was published just days before MPs voted on it, giving them inadequate time to consult or reflect upon it. The time for debate was minimal. The Committee examining the Bill took only three days of evidence: not all voices were heard, and it comprises an undue number of supporters of the Bill. In short, this is no way to legislate on such an important and morally complex issue.
And the fool trotted out the tired old “palliative care” argument:
This [palliative care] is already provided to many in our society but, tragically, is in short supply and underfunded. No-one should be dispatched as a burden to others. Instead, a good society would prioritise care for the elderly, the vulnerable, and the weak. The lives of our families are richer for cherishing their presence.
The Bill’s Third Reading and vote will take place on or around Friday, 25 April.
Last month “thousands” of Christians across the UK reportedly united in prayer against two proposals to introduce assisted suicide in Great Britain.
Anti-LGBT+ hate group the Christian Institute, Affinity, CARE, the Christian Medical Fellowship and the Evangelical Alliance invited Christians to encourage their church and friends to join a national day of prayer on the issue.
Meanwhile, just over a week ago, the Isle of Man voted to become the first place in British Isles to approve right to die, in the face of strong religious opposition.

For instance, Canon Dr Sugden, above, Chairman of Anglican Mainstream, blathered ahead of the vote:
Pray that God will move in the hearts of those who are taking these decisions to see the extreme dangers that they’re putting people in.
As someone who produced dozens of nativity plays as a teacher and a Sunday School leader, that title ‘A Gay…
The defence of a Christian view never seems to be settled by debate: exchange of facts, reference to historical events.…
But …… Rwanda is a safe place: Parliament says so.https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2024/8/contentsSafety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 S 2 Safety…
Religion can survive only on the most unquestionable assumptions. The statements made on Sundays on the BBC as if they…
Yes, if I’ve got anything remotely like a phobia, as an ex-fundy, its bibles, churches, tracts etc. I like to…
Please help me keep The Angry Atheist going with a donation.
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly


Leave a reply to barriejohn Cancel reply