Minnesota university art history instructor sacked over a 14th century painting of the ‘prophet’ Mohammed

Image courtesy of Edinburgh University Library, Scotland (Wikipedia CC

***This piece has been updated to include the name of the instructor***

A depiction of Mohammed receiving his first revelation from the angel Gabriel has led to the sacking of the Hamline University instructor after a student, who is also president of the Muslim Student Association, threw a hissy fit.

According to Religion News Service, Aram Wedatalla complained to the administration, saying it was offensive and disrespectful to Muslims.

In the university’s student paper, The Oracle, Wedatalla was quoted last December as saying:

As a Muslim, and a Black person, I don’t feel like I belong, and I don’t think I’ll ever belong in a community where they don’t value me as a member, and they don’t show the same respect that I show them.

Erika Lopez Prater, who gave students both written and verbal warnings that the medieval Islamic painting would be shown and allowed students not to participate if they didn’t want to, was forced into a position of having to apologise:

I would like to apologize that the image I showed in class on [Oct. 6] made you uncomfortable and caused you emotional agitation. It is never my intention to upset or disrespect students in my classroom.

Wedatalla’s infantile complaint and the instructor’s dismissal sparked a row and led to a petition “in Support of the Dismissed Hamline Instructor Wrongly Accused of Islamophobia.”

As of today the petition has garnered almost 2,500 signatures.

It says:

It is our understanding that the Hamline instructor noted in their syllabus that such images would be included in the course, that the visual exercise and discussion were optional, and that they gave verbal cues both before and after the image was shown in their online class.

The student who complained about its inclusion in the course was thus given not one but several opportunities to not engage with the image (and it should be noted that a number of faculty do not include such warnings or options to disengage from historical evidence in their courses).


Shamefully, the Baptist-affiliated university reacted to Wedatalla’s complaint by telling students who supported the academic that the display of the image was:

Undeniably inconsiderate, disrespectful and Islamophobic.

The instructor’s contract was not renewed, and a spring semester class the instructor was supposed to teach was canceled.

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression has called on Hamline to reinstate the instructor, saying that:

Minnesota’s Hamline University has betrayed its commitment to “embrace” free expression, including potentially “unpopular and unsettling” ideas.  

A university spokesperson did not respond to emails or phone messages.

The painting in question, a prized medieval painting included in a manuscript written by a 14th-century Muslim statesman and scholar, illustrates Mohammed’s call to prophecy by the Angel Gabriel. It shows Gabriel pointing to MMohammed, instructing him to recite God’s words.

Not all Muslims are offended

Muslim scholars, according to RNS, have rushed to defend the painting, owned by the Edinburgh University Library, saying it was intended to extol Mohammed, not to denigrate him.

Said Ali Asani, professor of Islamic religion and culture at Harvard:

To make blanket statements that this is prohibited, especially the image in question, is absolutely wrong. It shows illiteracy about religion.

Reached by Religion News Service, several Muslim scholars said pictorial representations of Mohammed are not typically controversial in an academic study.

Said Omid Safi, professor of Asian and Middle Eastern studies at Duke University:

I tell students we’re going to be looking at Muslim devotional art. I know some students may not have seen these before, and some may have even been told it’s not done, but it’s a historic part of the tradition.

Safi said he doesn’t give students the choice to opt out, as the Hamline instructor did.

Jyllands-Posten’s Mohammed cartoon from 2005 and Charlie Hebdo’s 2011 cover. Image via the National Review.

RNS suggested that the aversion to any depiction of the “prophet” may in part be due to the “offensive cartoons” of Big Mo published in the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in 2015. In that instance, two Muslims marched into the offices of the magazine and killed of 12 Charlie Hebdo employees.

University administrators, however, have defended their actions, suggesting that showing the image was “hurtful” to Muslim students.

Image via Hamline University

In a Dec 9, 2022, letter, Hamline President Fayneese Miller, above, wrote:

It is not our intent to place blame; rather, it is our intent to note that in the classroom incident—where an image forbidden for Muslims to look upon was projected on a screen and left for many minutes—respect for the observant Muslim students in that classroom should have superseded academic freedom.

If anyone should be sacked its Miller for her moronic response.

• If you spot any typos in this piece, please email me at freethinkered@aol.com. Use this address to send me links to stories you believe would fit well on this site.

You can support my work in three ways via PayPal, Buy Me a Coffee or GofundMe.

5 responses to “Minnesota university art history instructor sacked over a 14th century painting of the ‘prophet’ Mohammed”

  1. Muslim students who think Mohammed is so vulnerable that this kind of defence is needed do nothing for their reputation or Mohamed’s. What comes across to me is that the complainers were looking to make themselves seem important. Happily, other Muslims do not agree with them and take an altogether more robust attitude.

    What is outrageous is that a woman’s career should be wrecked by this kind of ridiculous dispute. I hope she is re-instated very soon.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. PS. Apparently showing the image was “hurtful” to Muslim students. Not nearly as hurtful as a woman losing her job and income. As an atheist I find much of the religious output on radio and television hurtful. But like much else in life I have to live with it.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. PPS Is President Faynese Miller, who so readily sacks a teacher for such an episode fit to be in her job. If I were a teacher under her control I would be very uneasy. And whoever, or which body, employs her should have a good hard look at the kind of person, and at what expense, they are employing. She has a disturbingly casual attitude to what she calls “academic freedom” and what is really freedom of speech.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Ms Wedatalla, I take it that there are no other reasons for minorities to get upset about in the US and this is a productive use of your time?


  5. Ms Wedatalla says, “As a Muslim, and a Black person, I don’t feel like I belong….” Well, too bad. But that is her problem. She seems to think this should concern the rest of us. Are we expected to spend our time making sure she “belongs.” Whatever that means and how might we go about arranging that feeling of belonging.

    Perhaps she should relinquish her demands about what can be shown to free people who want free speech. The task of making her feel she belongs rests with her. Attempting to censor what others may see will only place her, rightly, further outside the fold.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: